Breast Cancer Legislation

Posted on July 25, 2025 by 1man1vote
VERY IMPORTANT LEGISLATION 

Congresswoman Maxine Waters Introduces Landmark Legislation to Improve Breast Cancer Treatment and Recovery Access

 

Washington, D.C. – July 24, 2025 — Congresswoman Maxine Waters (CA-43), a senior member of the U.S. House of Representatives and Ranking Member of the Financial Services Committee, introduced two major health-focused bills designed to eliminate disparities in breast cancer treatment and ensure all women have access to comprehensive care and recovery services. The proposed legislation, H.R. 4543 – the Medicaid Breast Cancer Access to Treatment Act and H.R. 4545 – the Medicare Breast Reconstruction Access and Information Act, addresses systemic gaps in coverage and patient education across federal healthcare programs.

 

Waters has been an unwavering advocate for breast cancer patients for over four decades. Her efforts date back to her tenure in the California State Assembly, where in 1978 she successfully championed AB 3548—legislation mandating insurance coverage for prosthetics or reconstructive surgery following mastectomies. These latest federal initiatives build on that legacy and aim to address longstanding inequities in treatment access, particularly among low-income and underserved populations.

 

“I am deeply concerned about the tragic and unacceptable disparities related to breast cancer,” Waters stated. “That is why I introduced the Medicaid Breast Cancer Access to Treatment Act, which requires all state Medicaid programs to cover breast and cervical cancer treatment services for low-income patients with no cost-sharing.”

 

This legislation also mandates Medicaid coverage for breast reconstruction surgery after a medically necessary mastectomy—a procedure many low-income women currently cannot afford or access.

 

The second bill, the Medicare Breast Reconstruction Access and Information Act, tackles the issue of informed consent and patient knowledge regarding surgical options. Waters noted a troubling pattern: numerous breast cancer survivors across the country have undergone mastectomies without fully understanding that Medicare covers reconstruction services. H.R. 4545 seeks to rectify this by requiring surgeons and healthcare providers to inform Medicare patients about their post-surgical options.

“Patients who receive thorough information are more likely to make informed decisions that align with their individual preferences,” Waters emphasized. “This leads to greater satisfaction and an improved quality of life following surgery.”

 

Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women in the United States, accounting for approximately 30% of all new cancer diagnoses each year. Although death rates have dropped 44% since the 1980s due to advances in screening, early detection, and treatment, disparities in outcomes persist. According to national health data, Black women are 40% more likely to die from breast cancer than non-Hispanic white women. These disparities are often tied to delayed diagnoses, lower access to advanced treatments, and gaps in insurance coverage.

 

Many patients from lower-income communities, including those reliant on Medicaid, face serious hurdles when seeking treatment for breast cancer. Some are forced to forgo reconstruction entirely due to a lack of coverage, while others are never made aware that such options exist. The situation is further complicated by inconsistent policies across state Medicaid programs and insufficient provider communication.

 

Through these two bills, Waters and a broad coalition of House Democrats are aiming to bring greater equity and consistency to breast cancer care across the U.S. healthcare system.

 

Both H.R. 4543 and H.R. 4545 have gained the backing of more than two dozen co-sponsors, including Representatives Debbie Dingell (MI-06), Terri Sewell (AL-07), Marc Veasey (TX-33), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), and Frederica Wilson (FL-24), among others. The breadth of support spans from California and Florida to Maryland and Massachusetts, reflecting a nationwide concern over health care disparities.

 

Local and social media platforms have reflected strong support for the measures, particularly among breast cancer advocacy groups and women’s health organizations. Online discussion has highlighted the urgency of reducing financial barriers to care and promoting patient-centered approaches that prioritize information and choice.

 

Community health forums in urban areas, including parts of Los Angeles and the Northeast, have echoed Waters’ concerns, with survivors and advocates emphasizing that education, transparency, and access must go hand-in-hand for truly equitable care. Social media users have also drawn attention to the emotional and psychological toll of breast cancer treatment, stressing the value of reconstructive options in restoring body image and confidence.

 

“Together, these two bills will help ensure that all breast cancer patients—regardless of income or insurance status—have access to the full spectrum of care,” said Waters.

 

The bills now await further consideration in the House, with supporters hoping to bring them to a vote during the current legislative session. If passed, the legislation could mark a transformative step in the fight against breast cancer and a significant expansion of rights and resources for patients navigating one of life’s most difficult diagnoses.

 

Full list of Supporters

https://1man1vote.com/wp/?page_id=916

 

Posted in ⚠️ ALERT, Minority | Comments Off on Breast Cancer Legislation

The More Things Change

Posted on July 23, 2025 by 1man1vote

Let us not forget that Television is one part broadcasting, one part advertising and one part programing.

CBS canceled The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour in 1969, “officially” citing their failure to meet contractual pre-air delivery dates for episodes. (a purely business decision) However, the true reason was the ongoing conflict with the network over the show’s controversial political satire and social commentary, particularly regarding the Vietnam War and civil rights.

Posted in Gop, Potus | Comments Off on The More Things Change

So, Which Is It?

Posted on July 21, 2025 by 1man1vote

So which is it?

Skins

No DEI or all DEI. Demanding that all naval ships, military installations, and now sports teams, be stripped of their DEI designations and be named only after good clean white folk, seems to be either reverse DEI or plain and simple white supremacist racism. Even more concerning and sinister is his new demand that, under threat of executive prerogative to F with their money, all teams should revert back to their (for simplicity sake let”s just call it) “slave names”.

With what is allowed to go for clear eyed vision, it becomes clear that he strives to intentionally, and brutally deliver on Manifest destiny, by forcing native Americans to just live with the indignity of those naming conventions. Once again for his own amusement, under the guise of electoral mandate, he does not shy away from any opportunity to “hurt someone and help no one.”

###

 

capitulation

[kuh-pich-uh-ley-shun]

noun

the act of capitulating.

1. the document containing the terms of a surrender.

 

 

Play Ball

 

 

 

Posted in Gop, Potus | Comments Off on So, Which Is It?

Getting High In America

Posted on July 20, 2025 by 1man1vote

In the late 1800s, Chinese immigrants in the United States, particularly on the West Coast, were heavily associated with the opium trade and the operation of opium dens. While not all Chinese immigrants were involved in this trade, opium use and sales became a prominent part of some Chinese communities, especially in places like San Francisco’s Chinatown.

Opium dens, often described as hidden and underground spaces, were typically run by Chinese men and became gathering places for smoking opium, These dens, sometimes adorned with red signs with Chinese calligraphy reading “PIPES AND LAMPS ALWAYS CONVENIENT”, served both Chinese and a growing white clientele, initially from the urban underworld and later from more “respectable” circles.

Opium use, initially a habit primarily among Chinese immigrants, became increasingly prevalent among the white population in the US by the 1870s and 1880s. This growing association, fueled by existing xenophobia and racism, contributed to a negative perception of Chinese immigrants, often leading to their criminalization. Discrimination and stereotypes: Anti-Chinese sentiment flourished during this period, stemming from economic competition, cultural differences, and outright discrimination against Chinese immigrants. Chinese laborers, often working for lower wages to support families back home and pay off debts, faced resentment from non-Chinese workers. This, coupled with the association of Chinatowns with gambling, prostitution, and opium use, led to racist campaigns that portrayed Chinese immigrants as corrupting society.

Concerns about Chinese opium smoking were exploited by those who sought to restrict Chinese immigration. This anti-Chinese sentiment eventually culminated in the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which explicitly restricted immigration based on nationality and was not repealed until 1943.

Some Chinese crime organizations, known as Tongs, played a role in the illicit activities within Chinatowns, including the opium trade. Originally formed as benevolent associations to assist Chinese immigrants, some Tongs became involved in criminal enterprises like operating opium and gambling dens.

It’s important to remember that the narrative of Chinese immigrants and opium in the late 1800s is complex and multifaceted, entangled with issues of immigration, discrimination, and the social and economic conditions of the time.

Nearly 2 decades later, the war on drugs plays on. Leadership still tries to blame China, for opium, but the narrative shimmers to and fro, to include Afghan poppy fields, and now Latin American producers, shoppers and street dealers.

Somehow, these politically charged, police actions are oft times built upon a ting of racial animosity, leading to misdirected conclusions that never seek to point a finger at our own users, addicts and junkies, seeking the thrill of the high. Is it the enemy abroad, the enemy within, or the leadership, using both to maintain their power base. We criminalize, deport and incarcerate dealers and those found in possession, rather than develop mental, medical or diversionary programs to stem the desire to use.

 

Play ball.

 

 

Posted in Gop, Local, Minority, Potus | Comments Off on Getting High In America

Anti-Crypto Corruption Week

Posted on July 15, 2025 by 1man1vote

Democrats Launch “Anti-Crypto Corruption Week” in Opposition to GOP-Backed Legislation

 

Washington, D.C., July 15, 2025 — Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee, led by Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Congressman Stephen Lynch (D-MA), have announced a coordinated effort dubbed “Anti-Crypto Corruption Week” in direct response to a trio of Republican-backed crypto bills moving rapidly through Congress. The legislative package, which includes the “CLARITY Act,” the “GENIUS Act,” and a bill opposing the establishment of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), has drawn fierce opposition from Democratic lawmakers who argue that the proposals would strip away key protections for consumers and investors, while opening the financial system to abuse.

 

The lawmakers argue that these bills could significantly weaken the federal government’s ability to monitor digital assets, provide regulatory oversight, and prevent financial crimes. According to public statements from Waters and Lynch, the proposed laws would not only embolden crypto-based fraud but also normalize what they have described as a series of ethically compromised ventures tied to President Trump and his associates.

 

“These bills, in their current form, would do nothing to protect the average investor,” said Waters in a press statement. “Instead, they would legitimize an ongoing pattern of abuse and self-enrichment using crypto schemes that have reportedly generated over $1.2 billion in personal profit for the former president and his inner circle.”

Among the key concerns raised by Democrats is the lack of consumer protection language within the bills. Critics have pointed to the failure of the “CLARITY Act” to address issues like investor disclosure, anti-money laundering safeguards, and protections for users of stablecoins — digital tokens that are often marketed as safer alternatives to more volatile cryptocurrencies.

 

Congressman Lynch emphasized that beyond domestic implications, these bills could also compromise national security and global financial leadership. “The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, for example, could significantly restrict research and development into a U.S. central bank digital currency,” Lynch warned. “Meanwhile, international competitors such as China continue to advance their own digital currency frameworks, potentially giving them an upper hand in global economic affairs.”

 

The timing of the legislative push by Republicans has also drawn criticism, coming just days after what Democrats have called “one of the largest billionaire tax giveaways in U.S. history.” According to Waters, the crypto bills represent a continuation of a broader effort to deregulate financial markets in a way that benefits a small group of politically connected insiders at the expense of the broader public.

 

In response, House Democrats are pursuing a multi-pronged strategy during Anti-Crypto Corruption Week. That strategy includes continued public opposition, the introduction of counter-legislation, and the use of procedural tools to stall or block further advancement of the GOP-led crypto package.

 

Among the Democratic initiatives is the “STOP Trump in Crypto Act,” which would prohibit current and former federal officials, including members of Congress, from personally profiting from crypto-related ventures while in office or immediately thereafter. The bill was introduced ahead of a private fundraising dinner hosted by the former president, which reportedly featured the promotion of a new meme-based cryptocurrency tied to his political brand.

 

This latest effort builds on a series of actions taken by Committee Democrats throughout the year. In a recent 13-hour markup session, Waters and her colleagues offered over 30 amendments to a Republican-backed stablecoin bill. All were rejected by the majority. The Democrats also staged a walkout of a joint Financial Services-Agriculture Committee hearing, citing the refusal to include provisions addressing executive-level conflicts of interest.

 

Following that protest, Waters led a separate Democratic-only hearing focused on what she described as a growing pattern of financial misconduct in the crypto industry, specifically tied to individuals closely aligned with the former president. Democrats later used a procedural tactic known as a “Minority Day Hearing” to convene a second round of expert testimony, further highlighting their concerns over the crypto market structure bill.

 

Behind the scenes, Waters hosted a page-by-page review of the CLARITY Act with subject matter experts in ethics, securities law, and national security. That session, open only to Democratic members of the committee, was intended to underscore what critics see as dangerous loopholes in the bill that could be exploited by public officials or politically connected individuals.

 

The opposition by Democrats is rooted in a longer-term strategy initiated under Waters’ tenure as committee chair. In 2019, she created the House’s first Task Forces on Financial Technology and Artificial Intelligence. These groups laid the foundation for the Digital Assets Working Group, which has since conducted extensive dialogue with regulators, industry stakeholders, and consumer advocates. Across two Congressional sessions, the task forces held 22 hearings, examining how digital assets could be regulated without compromising consumer protection or national security.

 

As debate intensifies in the days ahead, Committee Democrats appear poised to continue their efforts to reframe the conversation around digital assets. “The stakes for consumers, investors, and our democracy could not be higher,” said Waters.

 

House Republicans, however, remain committed to passing the crypto legislation, touting it as a means to promote innovation and reduce regulatory uncertainty for emerging financial technologies.

 

The legislative fate of the bills remains uncertain as the Democratic-led opposition continues to gain visibility through hearings, public statements, and proposed countermeasures.

 

Post Note:

The dangers of cryptocurrency include extreme price volatility. The blood curdling, unexpected and unexplainable, dips in cryptocurrency ledgers are what democrats are warning of. Although the allure of equally unexplained recoveries continue to captivate investors. Still it is the lack of regulation, meaning fewer investor protections and greater security risks like hacking and fraud, and the irreversibility of transactions, making it hard to recover lost funds that should inspire more guard rails and government oversight. If you should lose your private key, you will most likely permanently lose your total investment.

As they say on these streets

“Ain’t no hollar back!”

 

Play Ball.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Gop, Minority | Comments Off on Anti-Crypto Corruption Week

Downpayment Toward Equity Act of 2025  

Posted on July 7, 2025 by 1man1vote

Congress Proposes $100 Billion Boost to First-Generation Homeownership Through Downpayment Toward Equity Act of 2025

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A comprehensive effort to ease access to homeownership for first-time, first-generation homebuyers is underway in Congress through the Downpayment Toward Equity Act of 2025, a bill proposing $100 billion in federal assistance for housing-related costs.

Spearheaded by House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Maxine Waters, along with Congressman Al Green, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, and Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia, announced reintroduction of the Downpayment Toward Equity Act. The legislation is aimed at narrowing the wealth gap and stabilizing long-term economic outcomes for millions of American households.

In the House of Representatives, the bill was introduced on July 16, 2021, as H.R. 4495 by Rep. Maxine Waters. It made its way to the Senate, and it was introduced on September 30, 2021, as S. 2920 by Senator Raphael Warnock.

Though it has experienced a bumpy ride the legislation addresses one of the largest financial barriers facing aspiring homeowners today: the upfront costs associated with buying a home. These costs, including down payments and closing fees, have become increasingly prohibitive as home prices and mortgage rates have surged over the past four years. As of mid-2025, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage stands at approximately 7%, while average home prices have risen nearly 50% since May 2020.

 

While overall mortgage originations hit record highs in 2020 and 2021 during a period of low interest rates, many creditworthy individuals—particularly those lacking inherited wealth—were unable to enter the market. Between 2023 and 2024, the share of first-time homebuyers dropped to a historic low of 24%, while the average age of first-time buyers climbed to 38. These trends reflect a tightening of access to homeownership at a time when housing remains the principal source of household wealth in the United States. In 2024, homeowners held over 40 times the median net worth of renters.

The Downpayment Toward Equity Act seeks to reverse this trend by offering targeted financial assistance. Eligible buyers may receive up to $20,000 in aid, with additional funding—up to $25,000—for individuals identified as socially and economically disadvantaged. The bill stipulates that recipients must be both first-time and first-generation homebuyers, with no ownership in the past three years and no parental history of homeownership during that same period. Former foster youth who meet income thresholds also qualify.

 

Income eligibility is capped at 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI), with exceptions allowing for up to 180% AMI in high-cost housing markets. Qualified recipients must intend to purchase an owner-occupied primary residence, which may include one- to four-unit homes, condominiums, cooperatives, or manufactured homes.

 

Funds would be administered through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which would allocate 75% of funds to states based on a formula considering population, local home prices, and homeownership disparities. The remaining 25% would be distributed on a competitive basis to eligible organizations, including some community development and financial institutions.

 

To ensure long-term success and responsible homeownership, the bill includes a mandatory housing counseling requirement. HUD-approved counseling agencies would receive 5% of the total appropriation to help prospective homebuyers complete education programs. In cases where counseling capacity is limited, participants can fulfill the requirement through alternative education options. Applicants denied financing after receiving commitment letters would be referred for further assistance and requalification.

 

Eligible mortgage types include loans backed by federal entities such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, USDA, and VA, as well as HUD’s Section 184 program. These provisions are intended to streamline access for buyers using mainstream, federally backed mortgage products.

 

HUD would also be required to submit annual performance reports to Congress, measuring the bill’s impact on homeownership trends and administrative effectiveness. Up to 1% of total funding is set aside to build state and local capacity to manage and implement program requirements. States may use up to 5% of their allocated funds for administrative expenses and training.

 

A key provision of the bill authorizes HUD and the Department of Justice to conduct studies that examine compelling interest in providing aid to specific disadvantaged groups, with recommendations that could influence how funds are allocated in future years.

 

Support for the legislation spans a wide array of housing, lending, and community organizations, including the Mortgage Bankers Association, National Housing Conference, Habitat for Humanity International, and the National Association of Realtors. Additionally, numerous local and regional housing advocacy organizations have endorsed the bill, highlighting its potential to provide critical assistance in underserved areas.

 

The Downpayment Toward Equity Act is positioned as both a practical and strategic response to widening gaps in housing access and personal wealth accumulation. By reducing entry costs, the legislation aims to offer more Americans the opportunity to achieve homeownership—a key driver of long-term financial stability. If enacted, the $100 billion in authorized funding will remain available until fully expended, ensuring sustained support for eligible buyers in the coming years.

 

While the bill’s future depends on the legislative process and budget negotiations in Congress, its supporters argue that it represents a necessary step to recalibrate a housing market increasingly defined by exclusionary barriers and rising costs. The measure is currently under committee review, with further debate expected in the coming months.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Minority | Comments Off on Downpayment Toward Equity Act of 2025  

Apartheid Refugee Resettlement

Posted on June 29, 2025 by 1man1vote

So under their stated mandates, it seems that Elon Musk,Trump, the GOP congress and DOGE did not halt any of the following services under the category of waste, fraud, and abuse.

Refugees resettled in the United States, including those from South Africa under the “Mission South Africa” program, typically receive a range of services designed to help them integrate and achieve self-sufficiency. This assistance is primarily managed by the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) and the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), working with various non-profit resettlement agencies.

Here’s a breakdown of the kind of resettlement assistance provided:

Initial Resettlement (First 3 months – Reception and Placement Program):

* Airport Reception: Refugees are met by staff or volunteers from a local resettlement affiliate, private sponsors, or family/friends upon arrival.

* Housing: Assistance in securing initial housing, which is often furnished.

* Basic Needs: Provision of a one-time initial resettlement money (e.g., $900 per person) to help with immediate expenses like security deposits, transportation, food, and clothing.

* Cultural Orientation: Information and guidance on life in the U.S., including laws, customs, and community resources.

* Access to Services: Help with:

* Applying for Social Security cards.

* Registering children for school.

* Accessing medical care and health screenings.

* Applying for federal benefits they may be eligible for (e.g., Refugee Cash Assistance, Refugee Medical Assistance).

* Connecting with employment services.

* English language training.

Longer-Term Assistance (Beyond 3 months):

* Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA): For those not eligible for other forms of cash aid (like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families – TANF), RCA provides temporary financial assistance for basic needs (food, shelter, transportation). This is often linked to employment services. The duration of RCA can vary, but generally, it’s for up to 12 months from their date of admission.

* Refugee Medical Assistance (RMA): For those not eligible for Medicaid, RMA provides health insurance coverage. Similar to RCA, the duration of RMA can vary.

* Matching Grant (MG) Program: An alternative to RCA, this program focuses on early self-sufficiency through intensive case management and employment services. The goal is to help refugees become economically self-sufficient within 240 days of arrival without relying on public cash assistance.

* Employment Services: These are crucial for long-term self-sufficiency and include:

* Job training and preparation.

* Assistance with job search, placement, and retention.

* Help with building resumes and interview skills.

* English Language Training (ELT): Classes to help refugees improve their English skills, which is vital for integration and employment.

* Social Adjustment Services: Connecting refugees with community-based organizations and support networks to help them adjust to their new environment.

* Specialized Programs: ORR also funds programs for vulnerable populations, such as victims of torture, and provides services like trauma assistance, childcare, and transportation assistance.

The specific “Mission South Africa” program expedited the processing of refugee applications for white South Africans. While the underlying claims for this program are controversial, the individuals granted refugee status under it would be eligible for the standard resettlement assistance provided to all refugees in the U.S.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Apartheid Refugee Resettlement

$Trump

Posted on June 25, 2025 by 1man1vote

Congressional Democrats Introduce “Stop TRUMP in Crypto Act” to Counter Alleged Presidential Profiteering

 

The most poignant statement that Congresswoman Waters hurled, directly addressed these concerns: “I know my Republican colleagues fear Trump, but I urge them to stand with me and my Democratic colleagues to pass this bill and send a clear message that the White House is not a platform for personal profit.”

 

 

 

In a move aimed at curbing financial conflicts of interest at the highest levels of government, Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), Ranking Member of the House Financial Services Committee, unveiled the “Stop Trading, Retention, and Unfair Market Payoffs in Crypto Act of 2025” — or the “Stop TRUMP in Crypto Act” — on May 22, 2025. This landmark legislation, also known as H.R. 3573, seeks to bar the President, Vice President, Members of Congress, and their immediate families from engaging in a range of activities involving digital assets.

The bill prohibits covered officials from owning a significant stake in any digital asset that would allow them to unilaterally influence it, from serving as officers or directors of digital asset issuers, and from promoting or profiting from digital assets. It also bans trading based on material non-public information, effectively addressing concerns about insider knowledge and manipulation.

 

The legislation was introduced against a backdrop of controversy surrounding President Trump’s cryptocurrency ventures, including his personal memecoin, $TRUMP, which has been at the center of public scrutiny. Reports indicate that $TRUMP has inflated the former president’s net worth by over $350 million, while investors have reportedly lost billions of dollars. In addition, Melania Trump has launched the $MELANIA memecoin, and the Trump-backed stablecoin, USD1, has drawn attention for its ties to foreign investors and national security implications.

 

Just hours before the bill’s unveiling, President Trump hosted a private dinner for top $TRUMP coin holders at his luxury golf resort. Attendees reportedly paid millions for a seat at the table, and the event coincided with a significant surge in $TRUMP’s value in the preceding 24 hours. This development, in the eyes of Waters and other Democratic lawmakers, underscores the urgent need for legislative action to prevent public officials from using their offices for personal enrichment.

 

“Donald Trump is preparing to dine with the top donors of his memecoin who’ve made him, and his family, richer,” said Congresswoman Waters in a statement. “Meanwhile, American families are getting poorer and growing increasingly anxious under his failed leadership.”

 

Waters’ concerns were echoed by other Democratic colleagues. Congressman Stephen Lynch, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial Intelligence, characterized Trump’s actions as “disrespect for the rule of law.” Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez highlighted the potential for foreign influence in Trump’s crypto dealings, while Congressman Brad Sherman warned that selling access to the presidency through digital assets undermines the credibility of the United States on the global stage.

 

Congressman Al Green added that President Trump’s second term has seen “corruption in this country reach new heights,” and that the bill is vital to ensure no future public official uses digital assets for personal gain. Similar sentiments were voiced by Congressmen Emanuel Cleaver, Bill Foster, and others who cosponsored the legislation.

 

The bill has also garnered the support of outside groups such as Public Citizen, Accountable.US, and Americans for Financial Reform, who see it as a critical measure to restore public trust and safeguard democratic institutions.

 

The proposed legislation comes amid a broader debate over the role of digital assets in the U.S. financial system and the need for clear regulations to prevent their misuse. While crypto enthusiasts tout the potential for innovation and new investment opportunities, lawmakers like Waters emphasize that, without oversight, these assets can become tools for self-dealing and corruption.

 

The “Stop TRUMP in Crypto Act” is now under consideration by the House Financial Services Committee, where Waters and her Democratic colleagues are pushing for bipartisan support. They argue that the bill’s scope — which extends to any President, Vice President, or Member of Congress — ensures it is not a partisan measure, but a necessary safeguard against future abuses of power.

 

“This bill will stop Trump’s brazen crypto corruption and prevent any President, Vice President, Members of Congress, or their immediate families from exploiting crypto in this way,” Waters said. “Enough is enough. Congress can no longer ignore the biggest scam and abuse of power in American history.”

 

The push for this legislation reflects growing concern that financial entanglements at the highest levels of government erode democratic norms and expose the country to undue foreign influence. As the bill moves forward, supporters say it is a vital step toward ensuring that the presidency and Congress remain dedicated to public service — not personal profit.

 

The outcome of this legislative effort remains to be seen. But if passed, the “Stop TRUMP in Crypto Act” would mark a significant turning point in regulating the intersection of digital assets and political power, establishing guardrails to protect the public and uphold the integrity of America’s democratic institutions.

 

The full text of the bill is available at link below:

 

https://1man1vote.com/wp/?page_id=787

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on $Trump

Commencement 2025

Posted on June 25, 2025 by 1man1vote

On May 30, 2025, the Maxine Waters Employment Preparation Center celebrated its commencement ceremony with a passionate address from a local congressional leader. As one of the largest adult education centers within the Los Angeles Unified School District, the center has long been a beacon of opportunity for thousands of students seeking to elevate their lives through education and career training.

 

This year’s class marks a significant milestone, with over 11,000 students enrolled—the highest in the school’s history and the most of any adult school in the district. The ceremony highlighted the profound commitment of the institution to providing inclusive, high-quality education to a diverse student population. From career preparation programs to academic enrichment, the center offers a pathway for students to pursue new ambitions and secure better futures.

 

Ms Waters, The keynote speaker praised the resilience and determination of the graduating class, encouraging them to carry forward their newfound knowledge and skills. She underscored the vital role of accessible education in strengthening families and communities, emphasizing that each graduate holds the power to inspire positive change.

 

The center’s mission resonates throughout the Los Angeles community: to prepare adult learners for academic excellence and career success. With an unwavering dedication to educational equity, the center is shaping tomorrow’s leaders, helping students break down barriers and build bridges to brighter opportunities. As the new graduates step forward into their chosen careers or further studies, they carry with them not only the lessons of the classroom but the hope and promise of an institution devoted to lifelong learning and community progress.

Ms. Waters quoted message was clear:

“I am extremely proud of each and every one of the students graduating who had the drive to better their lives and improve their community”, said Congresswoman Waters. “Your graduation is a testament to your strength, your character, and your ability to believe in yourselves and never give up on your dreams. Whatever you do, know that your families, our community, and our entire nation are depending on you. I want you all to go through life with your heads held high, understanding that you can achieve any goal you set for yourselves. I know you are already inspired. You can and you will Achieve the Impossible! Congratulations to the class of 2025!”

 

And with these storied words of encouragement, Congresswoman Waters set forth and launched a graduating class of hopeful young men and women, whose direction is forever enlightened.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Local | Comments Off on Commencement 2025

CLASS Act

Posted on June 25, 2025 by 1man1vote

During his morning monologues, The late Rush Limbaugh used to sermonize that“words mean things”. The word “Doge” has a couple of distinct meanings:

Historically, “Doge” refers to an elected lord and head of state in medieval Venetian and Renaissance periods, and later it transferred onward into the time of Benito Mussolini.

Somehow today’s search for Government Efficiency has perhaps unfortunately or ironically carried DOGE back into our popular lexicon of modern usage. Although the concept of authoritarianism made its way alongside our modern usage, this four letter word is but an acronym that the GOP used to sweep themselves into power, promising maximum productivity and austerity,

What we ended up with is policies that tend to hurt some, and ultimately help none. The present administration is so busy enacting public policy, that the concept of public service is never even mentioned on their side of the aisle.

 

But there is still the other side of the aisle. In a renewed effort to protect students from predatory educational practices, Congresswoman Maxine Waters and Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin have reintroduced the Court Legal Access and Student Support (CLASS) Act. The bicameral legislation is designed to ensure students defrauded by for-profit colleges have the right to take legal action, ending the widespread use of mandatory arbitration clauses that often deny students their day in court.

 

The CLASS Act seeks to prohibit institutions of higher education from accessing federal Title IV student aid funds if they include mandatory arbitration agreements in their enrollment contracts or otherwise limit students’ ability to file claims in court. The legislation targets for-profit colleges, many of which have historically relied on these clauses to shield themselves from legal scrutiny, even in cases of fraud or misrepresentation.

 

“For years, students have been stripped of their basic rights through fine print in enrollment contracts,” Waters said during the announcement. “Predatory for-profit colleges have used these clauses to avoid accountability while continuing to profit off public funds and students’ futures.”

 

Durbin echoed similar concerns, calling the legislation an important step toward ending exploitative tactics that leave students without recourse when they are misled about programs, job placement rates, or accreditation status.

 

Under the proposed law, any for-profit institution that includes forced arbitration clauses would be disqualified from participating in federal student aid programs. The bill also ensures that the Federal Arbitration Act does not apply to student enrollment agreements, effectively nullifying arbitration mandates that have been upheld in past legal disputes. The legislation would take effect one year after enactment, giving schools a transition period to bring their policies into compliance.

 

The CLASS Act does not apply to legitimate non-profit colleges and universities, which typically do not include such restrictive clauses in their agreements. The bill is narrowly tailored to address ongoing issues within the for-profit education sector, which has seen repeated enforcement actions, campus closures, and bankruptcy filings in recent years, leaving thousands of students in financial and academic limbo.

 

On social media, student advocacy groups and consumer protection organizations have rallied behind the bill. Some commenters shared firsthand experiences of being denied access to legal recourse after discovering that arbitration agreements blocked them from suing for tuition refunds or damages.

 

Supporters say the legislation is a critical step in restoring fairness to higher education, particularly for low-income and first-generation college students who are disproportionately targeted by for-profit institutions. They argue that public funds should not support schools that deprive students of the ability to hold them accountable.

 

If passed, the CLASS Act would mark a significant shift in the federal government’s oversight of for-profit colleges and mark a major win for student rights. Advocates, across the country, are in support of the way forward for the student body – the citizens.

 

Play ball.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CLASS Act