Maxine Waters Addresses Housing Priorities

Congresswoman Maxine Waters Calls for Bold Housing Action, Highlights Impact on California Communities

 

Washington, D.C. — California’s housing crisis took center stage this week as Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), Ranking Member of the House Financial Services Committee, addressed members of the Public Housing Authorities Directors Association (PHADA) during their Annual Legislative Forum. PHADA represents 1,900 housing agencies nationwide, including dozens across California that provide lifelines to families struggling with rising rents, homelessness, and limited affordable housing options.

 

For Waters, who represents South Los Angeles and Inglewood, the connection between national housing policy and local realities is deeply personal. California is home to the nation’s largest homeless population and some of the steepest housing costs, making the state a key focal point in the national debate.

 

In her remarks, Waters pointed to staggering national statistics: rents up nearly 47 percent since 2019, home prices surging by 57 percent, and more than 770,000 people experiencing homelessness on any given night. In California, those numbers are even more dire. More than 180,000 people are unhoused statewide—about a quarter of the national total—with Los Angeles County alone accounting for over 75,000.

 

“These numbers aren’t abstract,” Waters told the forum. “In California, our housing authorities are grappling with record homelessness, overcrowded shelters, and families waiting years for housing vouchers that simply aren’t available.”

 

California’s public housing authorities play a central role in addressing these challenges. Agencies in Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, and smaller cities across the state manage over 300,000 affordable housing units and administer tens of thousands of housing choice vouchers. Yet even as demand grows, resources remain limited. Waitlists for housing assistance in many California cities have been closed for years, with tens of thousands of families still waiting.

Waters sharply criticized the Trump administration’s housing rollbacks, saying cuts to fair housing enforcement and HUD staff made the job of California housing authorities harder. For agencies already overwhelmed by rising housing costs, those cuts translated into fewer resources to combat discrimination, slower response times for maintenance, and greater challenges in expanding affordable housing stock.

 

She then highlighted her legislative priorities and underscored their significance for California communities:

 

Housing Crisis Response Act: By funding construction and preservation of deeply affordable housing, the act could provide a direct boost to California, where shortages are most severe. In Los Angeles alone, more than 500,000 additional affordable units are needed to meet demand.

 

Ending Homelessness Act: Waters emphasized how the measure could support California’s growing network of housing authorities and nonprofits that provide wraparound services to people living on the streets.

 

Downpayment Toward Equity Act: With California’s homeownership rate lagging behind the national average—particularly for Black and Latino families—Waters said the act could help first-generation buyers access homeownership in one of the nation’s most expensive housing markets.

 

Strengthening Housing Supply Act: Waters noted this would allow California communities to use Community Development Block Grants to expand housing options and keep rents affordable, particularly in rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods.

 

California housing leaders in attendance and online echoed Waters’ points. Representatives from Los Angeles and San Diego shared that rising construction costs, stagnant federal support, and surging demand have left agencies scrambling to keep up. On social media, advocates praised Waters for centering California in her remarks, noting that state-level solutions depend heavily on sustained federal investment.

 

“Congresswoman Waters has always been a champion for communities like ours,” one California housing authority official wrote. “Her push for federal action is exactly what we need to address the scale of the crisis we see every day.”

 

Waters closed her speech by reaffirming her commitment to ensuring that California’s public housing authorities—and the families they serve—remain at the heart of national housing solutions. “California’s challenges are America’s challenges,” she said. “When we make progress in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Sacramento, we show the nation what’s possible.”

 

For PHADA’s California members, Waters’ message was both a recognition of the outsized challenges they face and a call to action for federal policymakers to match the urgency felt in communities across the state.

STORY: Charles Jackson

Waters Applauds Court Ruling

Court Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook: 

Waters Applauds Court Ruling

 

A federal court has issued a preliminary injunction blocking former President Donald Trump’s effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, drawing swift praise from top Democrats, including Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA). The ruling marks a significant moment in the ongoing struggle over the independence of the nation’s central bank and the limits of presidential power.

 

In her statement, Congresswoman Waters hailed the court’s decision as “a victory for our democracy, the rule of law, and the independence of the Federal Reserve.” She emphasized that the ruling made clear that Trump’s attempt to oust Cook failed to meet the legal standard of “for cause” removal and violated her constitutional due process rights.

 

“This decision sends a strong message,” Waters declared. “Donald Trump is wrong—he is not above the law. His radical attempt to remove Federal Reserve Board Governor Lisa Cook was not only unlawful but also a dangerous effort to politicize the Federal Reserve, threatening our economy, retirement security, and stability of global markets.”

 

The Case Against Cook

The Trump administration had alleged that Governor Cook committed malfeasance related to her real estate holdings, specifically a condominium in Atlanta. Trump’s allies claimed Cook misrepresented the property as a primary residence on certain forms. However, reporting from Reuters and court filings undercut those claims.

 

Documents reviewed by reporters showed that in her most recent loan estimate from May 2021, Ms. Cook described the Atlanta condo as a “vacation home.” On a federal security clearance form, she listed it as a “second home.” Fulton County tax records confirmed she had never claimed a homestead exemption on the property, the typical designation for a primary residence.

These facts appeared to undermine the administration’s assertion of misconduct and lent weight to the court’s view that the attempt at removal lacked credible grounds.

 

Political and Economic Stakes

The independence of the Federal Reserve has long been considered sacrosanct, meant to shield monetary policy decisions from short-term political pressures. Trump’s move to remove Cook—a respected economist and the first Black woman to serve as a Fed governor—ignited alarm across financial, political, and academic circles.

 

Economists warned that political interference of this scale could destabilize U.S. financial markets and weaken confidence in American institutions abroad. On social media, finance professionals and commentators highlighted the potential dangers: “If the Fed becomes an arm of whoever sits in the White House, inflation, interest rates, and the dollar itself become political footballs,” one analyst posted on X (formerly Twitter).

 

Many users echoed Waters’ warning that weaponizing central banking could lead to higher inflation and risks for everyday Americans’ savings. “Trump is trying to turn the Fed into a campaign tool. That’s not just illegal, it’s reckless,” wrote another commenter.

 

International media outlets also covered the story, with European and Asian financial papers noting parallels to instances in other countries where central bank independence was eroded, often leading to investor flight and economic turmoil.

 

A Fight Far From Over

Though the ruling allows Cook to remain in her position for now, the legal battle is far from over. Waters cautioned that Trump is likely to push the case all the way to the Supreme Court in what she described as “an ongoing and desperate effort to seize control of every level of the financial system.”

 

For Democrats, the case is about more than one official—it represents a broader fight to protect the institutional safeguards that underpin the American economy. For Trump and his allies, it is another front in their campaign to reshape federal power.

As of now, Lisa Cook continues her service on the Federal Reserve Board, carrying out her role in helping guide U.S. monetary policy. But with appeals looming and political stakes high, the battle over her tenure underscores just how fragile the boundaries between politics and the nation’s most important economic institutions have become.

 

The Road Is Long, With Many A Winding Turn.

~The Hollies

 

Story: Charles Jackson

Two-Bill HIV Prevention Package

Washington, D.C. – September 6, 2025: Maxine Waters Introduces Two-Bill HIV Prevention Package in the U.S. Conference on HIV/AIDS

 

     As thousands gathered in Washington, D.C. for the U.S. Conference on HIV/AIDS this week, Congresswoman Maxine Waters (CA-43), Ranking Member of the House Financial Services Committee, introduced a pair of bills aimed at strengthening prevention efforts and expanding access to life-saving HIV prevention medications.

     The legislative package, announced on September 4, includes the HIV Prevention Now Act (H.R. 5126) and the PrEP and PEP are Prevention Act (H.R. 5127). Together, the measures seek to restore and expand federal HIV prevention funding, while also requiring insurance providers to cover preventive medications without out-of-pocket costs.

Ms. Waters, who has been a leading voice in HIV/AIDS policy since the 1980s, said the bills are designed to protect progress made in reducing new HIV infections while addressing persistent barriers in vulnerable communities.

“I am deeply concerned by the continuing spread of HIV in communities across the United States,” Waters said. “These bills will ensure that we can prevent new HIV infections, save lives, and stop the spread of HIV.”

The HIV Prevention Now Act

H.R. 5126 would appropriate $2.165 billion in Fiscal Year 2026 for the CDC’s National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention. The measure also reverses a proposed funding cut in President Donald Trump’s FY2026 budget, which had eliminated certain HIV prevention allocations.

 

“Urging people to fight like hell to protect funding and public health structures,” Ms. Waters warned that reductions in prevention funding could lead to “thousands of new HIV infections” nationwide. Public health advocates echoed that concern, noting that state health departments and community-based organizations rely heavily on CDC grants to implement outreach, testing, and education programs.

 

Carl Schmid, Executive Director of the HIV Hepatitis Policy Institute, praised the measure’s scope. “Ensuring sufficient and stable funding for the CDC so that health departments, community-based organizations, and other grantees can implement HIV and hepatitis prevention programs nationwide is vitally important,” Schmid said. He criticized the administration for dismissing the entire staff of HHS offices that support HIV programs.

 

The PrEP and PEP Are Prevention Act

The companion bill, H.R. 5127, focuses on access to medication. It requires health insurance plans to cover Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) without co-pays or cost-sharing.

PrEP, when taken as prescribed, reduces the risk of HIV infection from sex by approximately 99 percent and from injection drug use by at least 74 percent. PEP, taken within 72 hours of potential exposure, can prevent infection after events such as unprotected sex, sexual assault, or accidental needle sticks.

Ms. Waters called the drugs “extremely effective” and “essential tools” in the fight against HIV. Her proposal has drawn endorsements from a wide coalition of advocacy organizations, including NMAC, AIDS United, The AIDS Institute, the National Coalition of STD Directors, PrEP4All, and NASTAD.

Paul Kawata, Executive Director of NMAC, said access to prevention medication is a matter of urgency. “PrEP is not optional—it is an essential component of our nation’s mission to end the HIV epidemic,” Kawata said.

Support Across the Advocacy Spectrum by Leaders from multiple HIV/AIDS organizations issued statements, applauding Waters’ move, highlighting the timing of the bills during a period of heightened debate over access to preventive health care.

Carl Baloney, Jr., President & CEO of AIDS United, noted that the nation is “on the cusp of ending the HIV epidemic” and argued that achieving that goal requires eliminating barriers to prevention drugs. 

Jeremiah Johnson, Executive Director of PrEP4All, added that the measure would “safeguard coverage protections for rigorously evaluated, evidence-based HIV prevention,” while ensuring continued access for those most at risk.

Social Media Reaction on the various social platforms have sparked discussion concerning the bills in a wave of thumbs up from activists, health professionals, and community members.

On X (formerly Twitter), several HIV advocates used the hashtag #PreventionIsCare to praise the legislation. “Access saves lives. Thank you @RepMaxineWaters for ensuring PrEP and PEP coverage stays in place,” wrote one New York-based advocate.

     Community health organizations posted educational infographics outlining the difference between PrEP and PEP, emphasizing their effectiveness when widely accessible. Instagram posts from advocacy groups in Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Miami framed the bills as especially critical for Black and Latino communities, which remain disproportionately impacted by HIV.

Some health equity activists also pointed to the broader implications for public health. “Protecting PrEP access isn’t just about HIV,” one user wrote on Threads. “It’s about reducing stigma, increasing testing, and making sexual health care affordable and accessible.”

     With her Long History of Advocacy, Congresswoman Waters’ latest effort builds on decades of leadership on HIV/AIDS policy. In 1989, she collaborated with the Clinton administration to establish the Minority AIDS Initiative, which has since grown from $156 million in annual funding in 1999 to more than $400 million today. The initiative remains a cornerstone of federal HIV prevention and treatment programs in communities of color.

Both new bills also come at a time when, despite medical advances, more than 30,000 new HIV infections occur annually in the United States, according to CDC estimates. Advocates argue that equitable access to prevention tools is essential to driving that number down.

     The HIV Prevention Now Act (H.R. 5126) and the PrEP and PEP are Prevention Act (H.R. 5127) have been cosponsored by more than two dozen House Democrats, including Representatives Nanette Barragán (CA-44), Joyce Beatty (OH-03), Jerrold Nadler (NY-12), and Rashida Tlaib (MI-12).

     As the conference continues through September 7, Ms. Waters and her allies are expected to push for broad legislative support, framing the bills as both a public health necessity and a moral imperative.

     In related developments, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced dramatic testimony before the Senate Finance Committee on Thursday, September 4, 2025. Kennedy as the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The hearing focused on his record and policies, particularly concerning vaccines, the CDC, and the recent firing of top officials. 

     Kennedy Jr. has a controversial history regarding his views on HIV/AIDS. He has been criticized for promoting the debunked belief that HIV is not the sole cause of AIDS, instead attributing the condition to other factors like drug use. As Secretary of Health and Human Services, he has stated that he supports funding for HIV programs like PEPFAR, yet has also been criticized for actions that have led to cuts and a restructuring of offices responsible for HIV prevention.